'UNPA'ralleled Comedy... and it continues

After closely following the 'Third Front' politics, I am left confused who is IN and who is OUT of UNPA. So, before going further into it, I must confess that I am not sure about parties which were then present or atleast present now in UNPA, and I presume that readers would understand my inability. United National Progressive Alliance, as the alliance christened by regional parties, is supposed to be an alliance which is equidistant from Congress led UPA and BJP led NDA. Ofcourse, as every regional party had their own ambitions and aspirations, and there was no common idea/ideology to bind them together, UNPA has been a 'waiting room' for almost every regional party whenever they needed one.

When UNPA was started, TDP (Telugu Desam Party), AIADMK (All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam) and SP (Samajwadi Party) have been the major parties advocating this idea of third front. Ofcourse, MDMK (Marumalarchi Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam), AGP (Asom Gana Parishad) and INLD (Indian National Lok Dal) were its other partners. Mr.Naidu's aspirations to go 'National' have taken shape, though his party's situation in his state weren't all that pleasing for him. The UNPA with its about 60 MPs formed a 3rd biggest alliance in the Parliament following UPA and NDA.

The first step of UNPA at the national level was supporting Dr.APJ for a second term. This, ofcourse, was much to the liking of most of the Indian public, as the polls of various news dailies and channels have shown that Dr.Kalam is indeed the best and most popular president, the nation ever had. However, the way it was carried along, ended up embarrasing Kalamji, and we had Pratibha Patil taking charge instead.

Following that, perhaps first to come out was AIADMK+MDMK. Ms.Jayalalitha, who was the secretary of UNPA then, had resigned for her post, and pulled her party out of the alliance. Again, I am not sure of when small parties like Jharkhand Vikas Manch came, saw and went, or whether they are still with UNPA. So, counting those changes as infinitesimal, we shall not worry about them. Following that we have SP leaving UNPA to UPA to support the Nuclear deal. UNPA then approaches BSP (or viceversa; ofcourse it really doesn't matter though!), who joins the 'Front', and now Mr.Naidu truimphantly claims to bring first Dalit lady PM to India in the coming future and proposes the candidacy of Ms.Mayawati for the next general elections. The left parties which has come out of UPA and now supporting UNPA for an alliance, however seems not completely happy with this idea. Only Mr.Chandrababu Naidu knows why BSP is been approached only after SP has left, if he had the idea of bringing 'social justice'. However, the equation is logical because BSP has the capabilities of winning a huge chunk of seats in the next elections, as it is a regional party in UP, and since it is not in good terms with either Congress or BJP. The INLD and AGP hasve joined the NDA back (again as per the best of my knowledge). The JKNC (J&K National Conference) led by Abdullahs now teams up with UPA, from UNPA, after the Jammu and Kashmir state elections, as teaming up with Congress is essential to form a Government.

Coming to the parties which might be in UNPA, I can think of only TDP. There is a fair chance of JD(S) (Janata Dal (Secular)) being in UNPA for a while, though Mr.Deve Gowda is whimsical and his son, Mr.Kumaraswamy, has proved to be no less than his father. The Dravida Parties would polarise towards one of UPA or NDA; generally DMK towards the former and AIADMK+MDMK towards the latter. Situation is almost the same in Bihar, with RJD being the close ally of UPA and JD(U) (Janata Dal United) with the NDA. AITC (All India Trinamool Congress) which has been an ally of NDA, again, would be in uncertainity till the election results are out. After the Kashmir elections, one more probable for UNPA for the next 5 years, would probably be Mufti's PDP (People's Democratic Party), since they would be forced to come out of UPA. Similarly, JKNPP (J&K National Panther's Party), who would be in a similar situation as PDP might be yet another one.

With all this hodgepodge, I hope I haven't confused you. But, if you are, please understand that its the mistake of neither of us.

The Kashmir Verdict

The 61% turnout in the Kashmir Assembly elections mandate was towards coalition for the second time. This turnout, which is far bigger than the previous times (45% during last elections), is greater than that of some of the states in India. This increase in percentage implies that the zero pre-election violence played a role in getting the voters to the poling booths. It also sends a clear NO to the seperatists, who continue their harangue in the news channels inspite of all this. Thanks to the election commission's efficient way of organising elections, we now can be confident about this as the Kashmir's verdict for their own Government.

JKNC emerges as the biggest party again, with its 28 seats. After being voted out of power in the last election, for a replacement by PDP-Congress alliance, JKNC looks to make a comeback this time. Just after the last election, the power bargains by the Mufti duo with the Congress went about for a month, finally settled with Mufti Mohammed as the Chief minister for the 'first-half'. The Common Minimum Programme (CMP) talk by the PDP seemed to continue after the end of this election also, though their seats are no way near for a formation of the Govt. But, even before that Congress has learnt a lesson for being with PDP last time, and would be definitely happy to team up with the Abdullahs than the Muftis. However, since Congress has 17 seats, though considerable, perhaps would have to settle for a lesser bargain.

BJP shines with a drastic increase in the seats to 11 from 1 of the last terms. All the seats of BJP have been from the Jammu area. The issues of discrimination against Jammu, Amarnath lands have helped the lotus party, and have won them a significant percentage of votes. BJP had 8 seats which was the highest till this election, in 96 elections, and have lost them all except for 1, in the following election. May be it is the time for the party to realise that performance should be the winning factor in their agenda for the election next time, rather than betting on the 'temporary' or emtional issues.

We hope that the parties take the mandate in the right spirit and work towards a 'Naya Kashmir', rather than worrying about who holds the CM throne.

Andhra: CPI's Claptrap and more

(The Andhra CPI's secretary Mr.Narayana continues his claptrap and produces enough material for the media whenever it is in the need of some news.Since an year, Narayana has perhaps been the favourite of news channels, their political jester, especially for TV-9.)

I am not sure of the media, but I became tired of Mr.Narayana. Perhaps media wouldn't be tired so easily, even if they are, he continues to entertain them with his new tricks.

Just today, he has made a statement that about 150 MLAs in the Andhra Pradesh Assembly are 'dacoits'. No proofs what so ever; sheer impresario act of pulling a rabbit out of the hat. Even, the number in Loksatta's list generally released before the elections about the contestents with criminal background is perhaps lesser than this. Ofcourse, he has make sure that the number is greater, so that he can make it into media yet again.

Just a few days back he talked about 'Maha' alliance, whose sole aim was to dismantle Congress in the coming state elections and provide a third alternative at the state level (the other aim perhaps being in news for a fornight). The speculations went around about the Left teaming up with Chiru's PRP and KCR's TRS, but finally he finally (had to) settle with the opposition major, TDP because of the Left parties alliance with TDP's chief, Mr.Chandrababu Naidu for a 'third' alternative at the Centre. And now with the elections in the corner, we see some more of the news making antics.

Watch out for more! and please dont look for facts behind those statements, else I am afraid, you might not enjoy.

Pakisthan: The cause or the effect?

(At the outset of Mr.Nawaz Sharif declaring that Mr.Ismail Kasab is undoubtfully a Pakisthani, yet another attack has been traced back to Pakisthan. Is Pakisthan, a 'rogue nation' or a country which is deeply affected by the terrorism, is perhaps the right question to be comtemplated now.)

A recent interview of one of the senior official and ex-journalist from Pakisthan in one of the news channel reveals some interesting statistics. Just this year, he states, there were about 600 major attacks in Pakistan, killing about 2000 security personnel, and people. Almost all the major cities: Islamabad, Rawalpindi and Lahore were deeply affected by the attacks over the past one year. He says though Pakistan has not been successfull in countering terrorism as it is expected to be, it is in the best interests of Pakistan to do so since it is perhaps the worst hit nation by terrorist attacks. The effect (damage) of terrorist attacks within the territory of Pakistan quadrupled from 2006 to 2007, and continues in the same trend. About 3600 terrorist related fatalities were recorded in just 2007. The interesting statement made by him, to be noted here is that Terrorism is a serious problem for Pakistan, as Naxalism in the most parts of India and LTTE as for Srilanka. But, ofcourse this statement seems inherently flawed, since Terrorism is not just been an 'internal' problem of Pakistan (perhaps Balochistan movement is!), and it affects the outside world in a regular basis and on a large scale; Almost 100 of the major terrorist attacks across the world, since 9/11 have been traced back to Pakistanis or terrorist groups in Pakistani soil, including terror in London.

The reasons supporting the other side of the coin seem stronger. A worldwide survey released by the BBC, recently, found that Pakistan was among two nations out of 23 (the other being Egypt) – where "mixed" or "positive" feelings toward Al Qaeda (22% and 19%, respectively) outweighed negative feelings (19%). After Musharraf resigned, replaced by the ever-controversial Mr.Asif Ali Zardari, leader of the country’s only national party in the country, the Pakistan Peoples Party, winning election with overwhelming support from the three smaller provinces of NWFP, Balochistan and Sind. But Punjab, with 65 percent of the country's population, remains out of his hands, run by rival Nawaz Sharif, who refuses to take the terrorist threat seriously and befriends right-wing Islamic parties. These two reflect the present psyche of the people and ofcourse the politicians. The attacks in Balochistan (which is about 43% of the country's territory) are mostly nationalist, though some of them have terror links. The Pakistani Army Chief, General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani (former chief of ISI), who replaced General Pervez Musharaf, is suspected to have a dominating say in the Democratically formed 'liberal' Govt. led by PPP, which was witnessed in the recent controversy of ISI chief coming to India for assistance in the investigation probe. The Govt. which confirmed the house arrest of Masud Azhar (the chief of Jaish-E) immediately following the attacks, has now denied the same. These raise more brows towards the 'honesty' and 'seriousness' of Pakistani Government towards mitigating terrorism.

But, the aftermath of mumbai attacks has proved to be a litmus test of Zardari's Govt. Gven that UPA govt is sincere in holding the pressure, we would see which one is true, perhaps in the due course of time.

Antuley, Akbaruddin and Anthony!

(Hang on friends! I am not going to digress from politics to discuss some latest re-make of RGV, though my title might remind of one of the old Amitabh Bacchan's movie. Its going to be politics as always: Mr.Antuley, being our hon.ble Minority affairs minister, Mr.Akbaruddin Owaisi, the representative of Hyderabad, from MIM party and Mr.A.K. Anthony, the central defence minister.)

Following the days of attack, I happened to tune to the Assembly sessions of Andhra Pradesh. The discussion was on terrorism and subsequently security of the state, and I hoped not much of a great discussion as usual, except for a united assembly standing against the terrorism unanimously. But, things weren't as they were expected to be, since there was an escape of a suspect just the previous day, so the opposition held this against the poor policing and security measures by the State Govt. After some discussion, our representatives (I wouldn't wish to use the word 'leaders'), digressed over the topics, and we witness Mr.Akbaruddin Owaisi going on a tirade on 'Hindu terrorists' not only damaging the nation, but also provoking the minorities (read as muslims) into terrorism! Ofcourse, he also claims the BJP is one of that group of terrorists and henceforth, he concludes BJP and TDP (who happened to support NDA), will have no reason to question the Government on the terrorism issue. I, listening to this, have no words, perhaps one of my readers would help me what to comment on!

And then comes our Minister of defence, Mr.A.K.Anthony. At the point where even UK and US were warning Pakistan on a military operation against terrorism (on the Pakistani soil) if they fail to meet the demands and act as required by the present situation, our defence minister maintains his cool insouciance, and says there can be no military action against Pakisthan or POK. Ofcourse, I am not a war mongerer, but we expect a statement which demands 'actions' against the terrorism from the Pakisthani side, but not the re-assurances on 'no war'.

This 'farce' doesn't stop there. Mr.AK Antuley, the present minister of minority affairs, (perhaps after reading too many chinese news papers), senses a foul play in the murder of Mr.Karkare. Antulay seemed to have borrowed a leaf from Pakistani TV hosts who have claimed that the Mumbai attacks were the handiwork of "Hindu-Zionists". (Courtesy: TOI) In the outset of investigations leading links to a Pakisthani terrorist outfit, a MP expressing his 'sudden revelations', (perhaps even borrowing statements from the 'neighbouring country') seems in itself fishy. Perhaps the minority vote-bank?

Remembering 13th December

(After almost 7 years following the attack of Parliament, we find ourselves 'back to Square one'. Though the attack on Parliament has been foiled by brave security forces, the attack on Mumbai was 'successful' in terrorizing the whole of Nation.)

After 7 years after the attacks of the symbol of soverneignity of India, the terrorists targeted the affluent and business world. Targeting Mumbai's CST, followed by attacks of Taj and Oberoi, the terrorists have exposed the vulnerability of Mumbai when it comes to the attacks from the terrorists.

Though the NDA Goverment seemed to fail in winning the support for a world-wide war on Terror in 2001, UPA seemed to have succeeded in getting the UN (and US) to turn against Lashkar and Jaish-E. Ofcourse, clearly, the intensity of the attacks played a role.

A few things seem to be common however. Mr.Advani, the Home minister in 2001, said in a press conference on 18th Dec. 2001 , "we have received some clues about yesterday's incident, which shows that a neighbouring country, and some terrorist organisations active there behind it." Precisely the same lines were used by Mr.Manmohan Singh, the Prime Minister, addressing the post-attacks address to the Nation. The house was united for a few days on the issue of terrorism and acting with utmost sincerity to uproot the problem. POTA followed in 2002, and there is a promise of more serious actions from the UPA.

So far, so bad!

(Except for the unanimous decision by the Parliament against the attack on Mumbai, nothing seemed to have gone right from the National political standpoint.)

Be it R.R.Patil's "Chota-chota" comments, Mr.Deshmukh's "terror" tourism or Shivraj Patil's incoherent press conferences, all of these acts have attracted the same "Resignation" command from the Congress Hi-command. Thanks to Rane-Chauhan drama, perhaps the Maharastra media is slowly forgetting the Mumbai terror attacks for the time being.

Even BJP's demeanor didnt fare well. Firstly, the following day after the attacks, Mumbai's streets were filled with "Shraddhanjali" posters by almost all parties, majorly BJP and ShivSena. But what is really disturbing about it is that all the 'political Shraddhanjali' posters carried their Party's and sponsor's names, perhaps even dominating the apparent intention they were meant for. During some of the post-mortem press conferences of the recent elections, one of the senior BJP spokesman was stating that perhaps they haven't cashed on the 'Terrorism issue'. As long as they see Terrorism as yet another 'issue' to get an election-win, it really doesnt matter who really holds the sceptre.

But, we have finally witnessed a unanimous Parliament on one issue in the beginning of this Winter session. Proposal of stronger laws, establishment of federal agency and anti-terrorism schools was received well by NDA too. We will have to wait and see whether any positive action is taken, or is it yet another rhetoric of politicians.

Freedom without responsibility!

(Nothing has gone right for India during the recent attacks on Mumbai. One of the aspect is Media)

The attacks in Mumbai has sent shock waves across the world. The terrorists tried proving India is as vulnerable as Pakistan, when it comes to Business by striking at the financial capital of India. But, events that has happened as a part of the operation of rescue, has only indicated that there is a lot of home work for India to be done: in its Governance, Intelligence, ATS, Media and ofcourse People.

The media's desperate moves towards increasing TRP ratings are evident at every point of the telecast. Starts with NDTV, and all the way to IBN, Aaj-Tak, TimesNow, everyone were busy with 'Live' telecast of the scenes and horror of the situation. Well, though I am a strong supporter of media, and 'freedom of expression' and press, there were several issues which pointed out that perhaps Media, (atleast this time), acted completely as per their 'whims', representing the case of 'Freedom without responsibility'.

The NDTV continues their 'cricket style commentary', using a continuous terms like 'strategy', and 'numbers'. The channels were insistent on re-iterating about certain pictures and coverage as 'exclusive and only', as if its some 'Page-3' content. The background and way of presentation of Aaj-Tak in itself seemed like a 'terrorist attack', quite successful in making its veiwers feel their nerves breaking apart or heart beating hard to their chests. The usual harrassment to the victims was a common event during the two days. The police officers, the Commandos are repeatedly asked about their next course of action, their 'idea' on who might have attacked.

The media was so 'close' and 'informative' to the operations that the terrorists were viewing channels in the hotels of Taj and Oberoi to know the next action plan of Indian Army. Even after the 'requests' by Indian Govt. to delay the 'live' and even after knowing their indirect abetting to the terrorists, the media continued with their news roll, with utmost sincereity and dedication. The remark of the BBC reporter that they have seem in 'no country' that media is 'allowed' to 'intrude' so much into a situation like that, probably sums it all.

The operation has ended in 2 days with about 200 deceased and almost 400 casualities. The Government, and the intellectuals say that we cannot completely blame media for what has happened because there were never strigent laws on Telecast or news, especially onto the situations like this. But, let us understand one thing: 'Law' and 'rules' cannot instill 'sense' or 'patrotism' cant be brought into people by a few pledges and 'laws'. Atleast, with our media boasting of world class journalists, we can only 'hope' of more responsible attitude, and we pray for it.

Congress abhores Terrorism!

(Though some people might dispute this, I must admit Congress strongly abhores terrorism.)

Yes, Congress does abhore Terrorism. So much so that, it had to include 'Terrorism' in the agenda of the Cabinet meeting, only after BJP's demands. Else, it doesnt even like to hear the mention of it. However, after the demands and reprimands from BJP, the Cabinet has unanimously passed a resolution that, 'terrorism must be curbed', without any new terrorism laws or special package of budget announced for it. Perhaps, we need to include PC Sarkar in the Cabinet from the next election to do this job for us.

Its closest allies Samata Party goes a step forward in the recent past. They happen to even provide defence for the suspects who were arrested in the Delhi, following the blasts. Mr.Arjun Singh would like to settle the matters 'peacefully'. He offers a sum of Rs.10 lakhs for the inspector who was killed in the encounter while arresting the suspects. (Though, the family of the matyr has declined the offer.)

After any of the recent attacks, we happen to follow one rather 'uninteresting' tirade in the News channels or the statements. They say the economics is playing a role here - unequal distribution of wealth, poverty in minority communities which draw them towards terrorism etc., I think this only means not just lack of understanding of the situation, but also 'falsely' justifying the actions. What we see from surveys from some of the researchers in these lines are quite contradictory to what these channels have been speaking over the past few days. Peter Bergen of John Hopkins University, published his study of some of the Islamist terrorists. According to Bergen, 53% of the terrorists had a university degree, while "only 52% of Americans have been to college." and about more than 70% of them have completed their schooling. The Masterminds behind the blasts in which a few were arrested recently, are well educated, and a few being Software Engineers. I hope these channels will get some more sense and stop this 'gross' economic analysis which leads us nowhere.

Andhra reaches US and Europe!

(The latest statements issued by some of the ministers of the Andhra Pradesh state cabinet, shows how Andhra Pradesh can be compared to US and Europe, perhaps even better than that.)

In the recent times, when the prices of the daily necessities are sky-rocketing (The tomatoes now in AP are 60/- per KG etc.,), the Minister for Food and Civil Supplies, Mr.Kasu Krishna Reddy, one of the close pal of Mr.YSR, has issued a few statements worth of including them in an opera of comedies. He says that the costs in Andhra are still regulated, as we can see that their costs are still 'far' lesser than compared to US and Europe. He also goes a step ahead in asking us to query the same with our collegues in the abroad! Though, I dont think I have to elaborate further on such these statments, does that mean that we have to be content that atleast in this matter, we are competing with the countries like US and European nations?

The irony is that Kasu Venkata Krishna Reddy, the nephew of Kasu Brahmananda Reddy, has been an MLA from Narsaraopeta since 1979. His uncle, Mr. Brahmananda Reddy has held key positions like Chief Minister of AP, Home Minister of India and also President of Congress etc.,

More on Assam clashes!

(The riots, arsonry and clashes continue in Assam for a week, in three districts, between the Bodos and Muslim immigrants mainly from Bangladesh. Different theories are floating around about the nature of attacks; let us see some of the recent events combined with facts, which throws some more light on the present issue.)

From the past three days, I have closely followed the news on the attacks in Assam searching for the latest events, statements by political parties and other information sources to understand the present scenario. Today morning when I have typed, "Clashes in Assam 2008" in Google, and 'felt lucky', I was surprisingly led to a page of Turkish times, which covers the event. May be, I am not lucky enough to get the Hindu's or Indian express' articles directly. The Kandhamal violence was 'lucky' to make it to the main page continuously in the Hindu for the past few days, and so is with most of the other news papers. While, violence in Assam isnt probably 'fortunate' enough to make a BIG event. Our media continues to ignore the north east, and for the Cabinet, its just one more ministry, which is generally used as a 'transit'. Mr.Shourie has written an article long ago, on how media sacrifices news from North-east, for more trivial news and gossip.

The present clashes have continued from past one week, has about 50 people killed and many villages burnt; about a lakh people made refugees. The curfew stands in the 3 districts with shoot-at-sight orders issued to the para-military troops and BSF forces. The 180 Refugee camps are been flooded with the people. About 200 houses being burnt over recently, and many such events.

As for the state government, "everything is under control". Health Minister Sarma said the root cause of the trouble was a programme of "ethnic cleansing" implemented by the National Democratic Front of Bodoland (NDFB),which is a largely Christian outfit and a rebel group fighting for an independent tribal homeland, and claims that it is a 'systematic pogrom'. The chief minister Mr.Tarun Gogoi said, "We are investigating reports of the involvement of the NDFB in the clashes and, if proved, we shall be forced to call off the ceasefire". Probably, his role even ends with a few statements and orders for few committees and investigations; or rather he is bored to see the same over and again. Let us all wonder together on how the situation is 'completely under control' with over 50 deaths and a lakh of refugees. May be Orissa and Karnataka should never even be brought to news compared to this. If they all are ignited by NDFB without any other group's involvement or any other intention, we must also be astonished to see many of this majority tribe being a big chunk of people who bore the brunt; many victims from Bodos. Interestingly, a newspaper from Pakisthan (the news) already begins to portray it as yet another ‘anti-muslim’ attack.

And from the Centre's (Congress (I)'s) point of view, their stance was made very much clear as a crystal by Ms. Sheila Dikshit a few months back. "It has been in our tradition to welcome all those who arrive in our country," Dikshit said. It doesn’t require intelligence to deduce that UPA would only welcome Bangladeshi intruders (I cannot call them refugees as long as they cause the damage), and even provide them citizenship and if possible reservations also in the due course.

The insouciance of the opposition is something noteworthy. Any opposition must realize that it is their responsibility to bring the issue to the public, and also to pressurize the Govt. to act faster and firmly.

What would be intriguing is the involvement of the settlers from the Bangladesh. We have witnessed a constant ethnic cleansing of the minorities there (do I need to mention it is Hindus?). This minority which was about 31% of population in 1947, has dropped to 22% by 1951, and then to 10.5% by 1991 and now by 2001 census it is about 9%. The opinion of some of the ‘secular’ economists, who say that “the politics of Bengal (Bangladesh) is the economy of the Bengal”, I am afraid, doesn’t resonate well with these census. The ‘loss’ in the Hindu population is not redistributed among the other minorities like Christians, since the Christians stand only 1% of the population. I hope our readers would agree with me that I need not be some ‘Hindu fanatic’ to raise voice against such statistics.

The bottom-line is that, if it is an ethnic cleansing by systematic attacks, by NDFB or by the Bangladeshi immigrants, we are in serious trouble.

PS: By ‘we’, I meant India.

Centre blinded on Asom's attacks?

(The recent clashes in Assam between Bodos and Muslims has not been noticed much either by Centre or the opposition. Even media who generally runs 24x7 'warning system' has more or less less 'interested' in covering this.)

The clashes between the Bodos and Muslims in the districts of Udalguri and Darrang district has taken a toll of about 50 people already. About a lakh and half people are in 180 camps in the districts. The violence is wide spread and the law and order have been greatly disturbed. The Congress (I) govt. led by Mr.Tarun Gogoi has been struggling to get the state out of the turmoil from the past 5 days.

YET, No news, no warnings, no letters from Home ministry. Well, we shall not blame them. PErhaps, it works differently in case of Congress ruled states. Mr.Patil might be personally calling to Mr.Gogoi's home to express his 'condolences' and 'wishes'.

Nano drives its way to Gujarat!

(After much discussion about the possibilities, both Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka Govt.s seem to fail in wooing Tatas to their land. Seems like yet another industry moves to the 'Vibrant Gujarat'.)

Is it another success for Modi? apparently it seems so.. so far! Tatas prefer to move to 'Modi's Gujarat' than the 'dormant' Andhra and the 'communal' Karnataka. Stable state Govt. in Gujarat, its pro-industry initiatives have done the trick, and Mr.Modi has done his work silently.

Ban on belt shops after 4 years of power!

( The deadline given for the state excise department to clear all the belt shops was given as 2nd November 2008, as per the latest orders of CM.)
Mr.Rajasekhara Reddy, the Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh, has issued orders to close down all the belt shops within the next 1 month. He has been blind to their existence for the past 4 years, and he just realized it just before the election. May be Congress will take up the personal responsibility of the distribution of liquor in the villages, and even that might go free!
There were over a lakh of belt shops in AP, in over 28000 village panchayats. They might be many shops which illegally exist apart from this. Clearly, the liquor fills the treasury immensely, as compared to any other commodity. No Government would like to miss that income, unless they are really keen in getting the alcohol away from the people.
When asked by Oppositions on why this sudden decision, Mr.Chief minister escapes saying that all these shops were strted in Telugu Desam reign. I really don’t understand how it can be an answer. Congress stops program of ‘Deepam’ and ‘Janmabhoomi’ with immediate effect when they came to power, even though these programs had a good reputation among the people. But, ‘forgets’ to worry about Belt shops as if they don’t have any right to stop it.

(Courtesy: Eenadu dated: 5th Oct, 2008)

The Present Speaker... and the next President in making?

(The nuclear deal has finally got approved today in the Senate of US, on the eve of Gandhi Jayanthi. After so many twists and turns it created in Indian politics, it hardly created any ripples in the other side of the Globe. One of the key event which took place here was the Somnath's 'betrayal' to the Communists. Though confidence motion in the Parliament though didnt sideline this issue much in the news papers, probably we havent keenly draw enough deductions.)

Somnath Chatterjee, studied in Presidency College and Cambridge University, was elected to Lok sabha for 10 times, consecutively, except once when he has lost to Mamata Benerjee. The 80 year old, 14th speaker of India, was in CPI(M) for fourty years, until the recent expulsion from the party, since he was unwilling to follow the party-line.

On July 24th 2008, CPI(M)'s Politburo has stated in its press-release that, " The Politburo of the Communist Party of India-Marxist has unanimously decided to expel Somnath Chatterjee from the membership of the party with immediate effect. This action has been taken under Article XIX, clause 13 of the Party Constitution for seriously compromising the position of the party". Though, Mr.Chatterjee has said that the expulsion is one of the 'saddest' part of his life. But, I am afraid it might not be so, as long as UPA makes a comeback in the General election 2009. Yes, I think he might be a propective candidate for the highest post as per our Constitution.

Mr.Somnath Chatterjee has supported UPA at a crucial juncture. Though, it might seen as a 'yet another rebellion MP', but its implications are deeper. He has opposed the very idea of what Indian communists apparently stood for. He has supported a Nuclear deal of India with Capitalist US under George W.Bush. This might be just an anomalous step for us, but its a 'revolt' for the Communists. The relations with his party has been strained from the past ten years, ever since Mr.Jyothi Basu has left the pro-active politics. His influence in party has come to decline with the Prakash Karat as the Central Politburo secretary and subsequently Buddhadeb as the Chiefminister of WB. Thus, he seems to choose the position of Speaker and opposing to what his political alma-mater has believed it, to his party, where he has been experiencing tumult in the Politburo over the past few years.

Now, here comes some speculation, as my title says. I think there is a good chance of Mr.Chatterjee of being the next President of India, atleast the candidate proposed by Congress (or UPA) for the next Presidential Election. The following are the reasons which have led me to this conclusion:

1. Mr.Somnath Chatterjee has always been a 'pleasant' Speaker for the UPA, and especially Congress. ehas not made fuss out of any issues, which demanded some serious attention.

2. He seemed to voice in resonance with the interests of Congress party. He was against POTA and the stringent anti-terrorist laws. He was supportive in the times of crucial confidence motion and nuclear deal. He sounded pro-Congress on Jharkhand issue, commenting on SC.

3. If he stands for the Presidential election, there is a high probability that CPI(M) supports him, despite of the expulsion, because they would'nt support the candidate by BJP for obvious reasons. The same sentiment which made Shiv sena vote Pratibha and Akali Dal vote Manmohan might repeat.

4. Well, he has all the qualities which Congress needs in a President. Atleast after seeing Pratibha Patil being the Hon.ble President of India, he seems to meet all the requirements as per Congress's highest command.

Ofcourse all this depends on given the condition that present parameters wont get disturbed much.

A Cartoon!

This isthe Cartoon in Today's (Sunday 28th Sept) 'Eenadu' (a telugu news daily) which resembles my previous post! (Courtesy: Eenadu Daily Dt.28th Sept, 2008)

Selective Colour Blindness!

(The recent clashes of Hindu-Christians in Karnataka and Orissa has caused much stirred discussion and debates in the news channels. There were warnings to the state governments by the Central Government of India, and the revoking of Article 355. The present article will focus on the implications on how (and why) the Central Government has reacted so. The author is not interested to discuss the details of the religions who were involved in the clashes: the goods and bads of who done what, but the actions of Central Government, which have left certain issues unanswered.)

Article 355 of the Indian Constitution states: "It shall be the duty of the Union to protect every state against external aggression and internal disturbance and to ensure that the government of every state is carried on in accordance with the provisions of this Constitution." And the following Article (356) empowers the Union to proclaim an emergency, dismissing the state legislature and the executive, in case of a breakdown of the "constitutional machinery" in that state.

Violence in Karnataka, Orissa and Madhya Pradesh is to be strongly condemned by anyone. Well, chaos in any place due to any reason at a large scale is bad for the society on whole. I am not interested to speak about some Hindu fanatics, or Islamic terrorists or aggressive Christian missionaries in my blog. But, I would rather limit myself to the political implications of the recent warnings of the Central Government to the state governments of the above mentioned states.

There was an organised violence in Kannur (Kerala) few months back. That was by mostly the Communists and it was on RSS supporters and BJP party members, ofcourse the latter too reacted vehemently on the agression. State has taken little steps to stop the violence. After that there was a huge violence in Maharastra on North Indians by MNS kaaryakarthas, on the basis of origin and linguistic differences among people. There was organised violence rampant for 2-3 days. State Govt. of Maharastra needed 'some' time to react to subjugate the terror, as the state govt. was not sure on how to react (to make sure that their vote bank is not disturbed).Thousands were displaced and terrorised. Quite recently we had the issue of Amarnath land issue in Kashmir. Peaceful protestors (who neither carried a gun nor a hand grenade) against the stance of a 'few' people, were beaten and shot by police; few killed and many injured. And all along, we have seen the Singur issue running over past several months. State Govt. was in dilemma on how to respond to it. We have seen protests national wide against the way State Govt. was acting, for different reasons though. Violence in Asom against the Hindi speaking people, was just seen as a 'small' seperatist act, and not noticed by the Centre. Violence on the Hindus by a few aggressive Chirstian missionaries in Tripura has not even been seen as a threat to peace. Now, the farmers of Andhra Pradesh face terrible crisis of fertilizers for their crops, which has ignited a state wide protests. And ironically the Central Government of India, ''fails" to notice all these! No threats, no warnings, no aritcle 355s.. nothing or such sort. But why? Doesn't it ring a bell? All these states are ruled by Congress or its allies (read: the Left)!

Mr.Naveen Patnaik, the CM of Orissa, has made an interesting statement in this outset. He says the Central Govt. hasnt responded properly to their plea for help when there is an outbreak of violence in Orissa. "We had asked the Centre for para-military forces to be deployed in Kandhamal. But they have been slow in dispatching forces to us," said the Chief Minister after the state government received a letter from the Home Ministry of GoI.

"Protection of minorities and restoring law and order is our top priority," said Mr.Gupta, the secretary of Home ministry. But, I would have been happier if the Hon.ble. Dept. of Home ministry says protection of 'citizens' rather than 'minorities'. I hope they would notice that we do pay taxes in equal proportion for the Government.

The fact is this: It is a shared responsibility of Central and State Government to ensure peace in society. Whenever there is a violence in any place within the boundaries of Indian Union, it is also the Centre's responsibility to ensure peace by supporting and assisting the State. Afterall, we pay taxes to support Police and paramilitary forces to ensure the internal security, and not for the 'Tamasha' of all these mutual mud slinging of state and centre.

5 Reasons: Why Chiranjeevi can't be the change maker!

(This blog is not about commenting whether Chiranjeevi would win the election or not. The central theme of this essay would lie on what the title implies, on why the 'Mega-star' cant be the catalyst for the change, as his party or his fans claims it to be. Let me define 'CHANGE' as I perceive from PRP's claims: "Change according to PRP is the step/endeavours towards a corruptionless and divisionless society". For all those who are fans of him, the author would like them to patiently go through the essay, before drawing their conclusions. Comments and suggestions are welcome!)

The 55 year old 'Mega star' Chiranjeevi atlast had this Political 'aarangetram' after the suspence and drama for an year. Though his first speech in Tirupathi, hasn't been too impressive, as compared to the much hype and arrangements which went into it, the event is surely a land mark in AP's politics. It is for the second time, a big screen supremo lauching his party in Andhra Pradesh, after the late NTR has started TDP in 80s.
Chiranjeevi is well admired in Andhra Pradesh for his movies and some of his social service activities. I too admire few of his movies. Let us keep the admiration aside for the sake of politics. Now, in this article, I wouldnt like to elaborate on my predictions on who is going to be the next CM of the state. There are chances even for this actor-turned politician to become the next CM of AP. However, I would like to comment on why Chiranjeevi CANNOT be the change maker, as his party claims. Let me elucidate on it point wise.

1. The very entrance of Chiranjeevi into politics has strengthened the Kapu caste politics. Some have dubbed his entry as the Kapu caste's cry for the power. So far Chiranjeevi hasnt made any statement condemning this. It is clear that he wouldnt like to hurt his Kapu vote bank, which means that he atleast wouldnt stand for what his party terms as, "Divisionless society".

2. As he initially told, he seems to be not standing for the concept of new and fresh 'blood' into politics. It was also stated that, his party stands for a change, and no place for the 'party-hoppers'. The party promised 80% of the tickets to the fresh men, which we need to wait and watch for. But, as from what we can see so far, most of the key leaders now in PRP are from TDP and a few from Congress, and most of the leaders of PRP in Northern coastel districts of Andhra are primarily who were dissatisfied by their earlier parties, as they werent successful to get a ticket.

3. His party is also doesnt seem to stand for the 'clean' politics as they have initially claimed. The leaders like Bhooma Nagi Reddy, Thota Trimurthulu have a criminal record as per a notification released by Loksatta before the 2004 general election, which implies that Chiru hasn't been very keen on this parameter.

4. Chiranjeevi's party has never expressed its interest towards forming an alliance or urged support from the JP led Loksatta party. Although, we can say that there could have been a possibility of 'ideological differences', but seeing the recent entrants into the party, I believe, ideological differences is definitely not the issue.

5. Chiranjeevi hasn't opened up his ideas and thoughts on the issues like Naxalism and Telangana so far. Although, it doesnt reflect an amibgious mind, but he seems to be too cautious about their effect on his election results. If, he is not bold enough on these issues, it would only mean that he is too worried about the outcomes of his responses or stances.

Well, Chiru can be an alternative in the present political scenario of the state. No doubt about that. Yes, He might be a 3rd alternative from the Congress and TDP. But, terming it as a CHANGE, is probably is big word.

TDP in troubled waters!

(After the advent of Praja Rajyam Party(PRP) into the political arens of Andhra Pradesh, the worst affected party is Telugu Desam Party (TDP). As we can see, almost 90% of the PRP's high command belongs to TDP's ex. It would be interesting to see how TDP's chief would come out to combat this.)

Few of the small or two tier leaders in Andhra Pradesh, are sure that a 'Nama-smarana' would give them power (or atleast money): That is Telangana. It all started with Mr.Chandrasekhara Rao, who came a long way in the politics, from just being an MLA of TDP. Thanks to his caprice, we havent seen any progress in either Telangana or Telangana issue. But, it has won a great mileage for his political career and probably to his family also.
Since then, lot of people became interested in the issue: starting from the Telangana Congress MLAs, then BJP, Ms.Vijayashanti till the latest ex-TDP leader, Mr.Devendra Gowd. All of these want to 'bring' Telangana.
Apart from this issue, which broke TDP twice, once by MR.Chandrasekhara Rao and later by Mr.Devender Gowd, TDP has seen only 'lows' in the past 5 years. After being in power for nine consecutive years, its ironic to see TDP struggling to maintain itself intact for just one period of opposition.
With the new political debutante Mr.Chiranjeevi, TDP had two loose its district level leaders to him. Tammineni Sita Ram, Bhooma Nagi Reddy, Ramachandrayya, Trimurthulu are some of the significant people who left the party for the new color. This definitely is a matter of headache to Mr.Naidu on how to prevent these 'party-hops'.
After being a stauch 'Samaikya Andhra' supporter, TDP cader finds it tough to voice the pro-Telangana state formation this elections. On top of that, Mr.Naidu's plans of striking an alliance with TRS, is much to the distaste of most of the TDP's members.
Another embarrasing situation was the No-confidence voting at the Centre. While Mr.Naidu was busy playing strategies at the central level by his UNPA, 2 out of his 5 MPs has voted pro-Congress. Though the reunion of NTR family for the sake of the elections could be benifitting TDP, we will have to wait and see, how far they can pull it up.
We have to admit that its really tough to 'stay' in opposition for a Regional party, unless it has an alliance at the National level. That is because, the party cannot keep its cader happy, by giving them some central level posts like Governors, Rajya sabha seats, Central ministries etc., as in the case of a National party. Probably, Mr.Naidu would regret for not being with BJP!
But, its also clear that its not tough to win an election inspite of all this. Afterall, Mr.NTR has won the power with entirely new set of people and he built the party cader of TDP.

Hyderabad Liberation Day! When was it?

(Another interesting event in the recent past! Most of us has left it unnoticed; well, even if we did, that was because of our Telangana voices. And as usual, why we didnt know much about it? I think the readers can take a good guess!)

We have just finished 60 years of Hyderabad Liberation from Nizam by this September 17th, 2008. More or less, the state left it unnoticed, except for a few 24 hrs news channels and news papers. The most of the people were unaware of it.
The pro-Telangana parties have celebrated it on a large scale. Ms.Vijayashanti also made it into news. The other 'undecided' parties like Telugu Desam Party and Praja Rajyam Party did a small celebration in their headquarters. Congress(I) was 'tranquil', ofcourse so does Muslim League of Hyderabad. ABVP's cries and protests ended up in arrests and Lathi charges.
Coming to the liberation, I havent learnt about it in my books. Though, there is a possibility of over-looking, I havent found a significant no of pages being dedicated to Hyderabad liberation in either CBSE or the State syllabus history books. And I wasnt a bad student of history afterall.
We probably havent learnt of Hyderabad liberation, because of 2 reasons. One was due to the credit to be given to Sardar Vallabbai Patel, and the second one, which is more significant, is the nature and details involved in the very movement in itself. Well, I wouldnt elaborate it further, but I would recommend to search for details about the movement to get more insight into it and to understand what I meant.
But one thing was the resultant of all: we didnt get into the trouble of having a mini-pakisthan in the heart of deccan. On a lighter note, we didnt miss the Hyderabadi Biryani!

Defenceless Home - Spineless Home minister

(The blasts in Ahmedabad, Delhi and now which probably aims Mumbai, only means a huge setback for the central policies on Defence. The present 'ever-ambigious' centre which seems to be always in dilemma on acting on terrorism, now needs to answer lot of questions about their citizen's security.)

The centre seems to be always worried on how to react to terrorism. They always seemed to be confused between terrorism and its links to Islam. We must realise that terrorism in any form which is dangerous to the lives of citizens must be seriously stopped by the Government, no matter which organisation, religion or caste they represent.
But, the actions of the centre only reflect their dilemma over the action against 'sensitive' vote bank. The Afzal Guru case also represents that, and we see this attitude of the appeasement program, where it means a lot: Kashmir.
J&K CM Ghulam Nabi Azad of the Congress, Communist and local political groups voiced their support of clemency for Afzal. It is alleged many have done so to appease Muslim voters in Kashmir. Ms.Mehabooba Mufti goes a step forward. She said that if clemency appeals were made for Sarabjit citing his Indian nationality, voices should also be raised for Afzal for "he too is an Indian citizen. "Two citizens of India cannot be treated with different yardsticks" she had said. But, little they understand that there is a huge difference. And our Home minister Shivraj Patil has said that Guru's mercy petition is pending with Delhi Government and it may have "some reasons" in delaying the decision. Wow! the Government of India and the Government of Delhi, which is run 'ironically' by Congress, has always got "some reasons" to delay the matters of security! He also adds that, "On controlling terrorism in the country, the police forces here were not trained to fight a battle against terrorist and they need to be trained for it." Well, after 5 years of staying as Home minister, only Mr.Patil can dare to speak like a consultant.
We all admit that security of the whole nation is a gargantuan task. But, at the same time, I would like to question what significant moves have been taken to mitigate this burning problem of today. For instance, Right to Information Act is a significant move to eradicate Corruption. 108 services was a good step to help out the emergency medical problems. But, what about security?
I wouldnt see POTA as a panacea of all the security problems. But, by just thrashing down POTA with no replacement wouldnt be seen as a sensible move. Mr.Patil is undoubtfully an over-hyped and ill-performing minister in the Congress ministry, who is definitely good at one thing: FLATERRY!.

The Nuclear Fiasco

(A blog after many days! The author was busy with his life for the last 2-3 months. There has been many interesting changes in the political opera over the past few months. One of them being 123 deal of India and US)

Let me not comment on the pros and cons of the deal, but the following things are clear; The left is not happy with the deal, not because we gain or loss, its just because the deal is with Americans. Had it been a Chinese proposals, our Communists would have danced well for the chinese tremulos well. Ofcourse, the outcome of their agitation might be good, although I am not sure how long the Communists will stay away from UPA. The reunion might have been scheduled just after Election'09.
Dr.APJ has said something noteworthy quite a few days back. He says that a Nuclear deal is envitable to survive the growing demands of Energy in India. But, thanks to our UNPA and media, the statements by the 'missile man' are carefully modified and 'tuned' pro-123 deal. However, it has also been made clear that creating a third option at the National level needs lot of dedication and sacrifice for the longer term goals. As expected, the other regional parties were thrown into tough situation by the decision of Mulayamji.
BJP has stuck to its stance quite well and clearly over the past few months on the deal. But, its sad that they failed to bring the issue closer to the public's notice, and explain the relevance and importance of the deal. Again, ignorance among the NDA's cadure is clear; as very few MPs seems to even know what it means. A very few like Arun shourie and Arun Jaitley seems to have voiced their opinion publicly against the deal quite clearly. The lotus party must realise that its their responsibility to educate their own MPs about the present issues.

Who will pledge loyalty to India?

(A brief and quick sneak into the present political 'developments'.)

Well as we see the election fever has started, oflate, our politicians are pledging their loyalties to their 'Saviours' and 'ideologies'.
Starting with our left parties, hanging with the UPA till yesterday, inspite of their failure with the Nuclear deal and other issues. Today, they join for a protest with UNPA against UPA, with safely avoiding talk on their 'outside' support. What is worse, Mr.Buddhadeb Bhattacharya, blames the PM and UPA for the backwardness and the tortoise-rate development of Bengal. That is understandable, as they (Leftists and UPA), have to fight their battles against each other in Kerala and Bengal, but will be 'Bhaiyyas' at the centre for 'mutual' benefit and development. (Well, what about the development of the people?)
The TRS chief, Mr.Chandrasekhara Rao, came out of the UPA just before elections, and started modulating his voice for the Telangana crescendos. He denounced the Congress and Smt.Sonia about their callous attitude towards Telangana and holds them hard for the betrayal of the Telangana people. But, at the same time, I hope he knows it is not the Congress, but 'a certain group of people' who remembers Telangana just before elections, and that Telangana is betrayed by those people. Nowadays, he slowed down on his views and comments on dynasty politics, as he is firmly planning for his own family into the arena. Atleast, some relief for the people in Andhra pradesh, that some undulating harangues of TRS would stabilize into just anti-congress atleast for the time being, previously about which they were always left confused.
(Cartoon Courtesy: TOI)
The congress men started calling Mr.Rahul as the 'Crown Prince', and 'Yuvraj' to make sure that they are there in the news columns. They would also like to get noticed in the 'benign' eyes of the party 'highest' command. Infact the constant Rahul mantra chant, has even irritated their bestower of 'boons'. Already Karunanidhi, Sharad Powar, Arjun Singh and Praful Patel strongly backs Mr.Rahul as the potential future PM for the next tenure.
"I shall also do everything to maintain loyalty and commitment to the remaining members of the Gandhi family," says our Arjun Singh, again on the eve of elections, trying to prove he is more 'hencher' than any henchmen of Congress. Ofcourse, I wouldn't doubt his loyalty, I hope so does Mrs.Sonia. But, my question is who will pledge their loyalty towards India?

Puppet Shows in Politics

('The great Indian puppet show' in one of the popular news channel has always fascinated the author. He would like to analyze a 'real-time' (unless you argue on what exactly is reality is) puppet shows in our politics. Thanks to some of our leaders, we always had the opportunity to enjoy them, inspite of the lack of patronage to this form of art. To be precise, a satire on indian politics.)

I was rambling around and looking for various museums in Paris, which houses some of the great museums of Art, Science and History. One of such museums is Musee-de-Quai-Branley. Not far from the Champ de Mars and a building near Eiffel Tower, Musee-de-Quai Branley was an attempt by France, to exhibit non-western art and culture, which has never been much of attention amongst the Europe. The endeavor is a wonderful one where the information regarding various cultures of countries, regions were brought under one roof.
What interested me most, ofcourse was the section on India. I was quite curious what would be from India. Indeed it is a well documented and a well narrated display about India: from Kalaripayattu in Kerala, Rangoli in South India, to the great festivals of Kali in Bengal. What was even more fascinating was the replicas of Puppet show and a video on it (called, "Tholubommalaata" from Andhrapradesh). Infact we must get inspired (ofcourse it doesnt mean copying) from them, to establish a similar one in India, only if we get out this (pseudo-) secular paranoia.
Puppet Show is an ancient art, where the artist (or narrator) narrates a story generally from history, myths or folklore to entertain audience of various age groups. To be short, it is a visual art, similar to the present day movies, which had a great patronage previously in India. Ofcourse there are some variants of the Puppet show, which seem to be endemic to places. However, its sad that we are nearly loosing this art form.
In the similar way, the Puppet show in Indian politics has always been an interesting episode. There are undocumented 'puppet shows' in the pre-independence era of the Congress party, where the members tried to serve their narrators from industry. This control from these 'outside' hands seemed to have worried Gandhi who has insisted to make Congress party into a Social organization, called Lok Seva Dal. While some of the leaders like JP, Lohia etc., supported it, the big stalwarts like Nehru and Sardar opposed it. Since, even my father was not born by then, its difficult for me to know the details of these undocumented shows, hence, I would forbid myself to get into that.


Now, considering the vogue prevailing of the present day politicking, there are three genres (or themes) in this 'art'.

1. "Government is for politicians" : The basic plot involves transformation of civil servants who would the cause of their own benefits. Ofcourse, the replacement basically depends on the 'interests' of the political party. For instance, the most popular script in this genre is the replacement of the Collectors, Commissioners, DIGs at State level by their Governments to facilitate 'better governance' and 'co-operation between people's representatives and the bureaucracy'. This has become a birth right of a politician in India, ofcourse the politicians interested in 'real-politik'.

2. "A dormant stamp": This involves electing or nominating a 'Yes man' (or woman :) ) to a post like Governor and President. Ofcourse, in case of presidents, Indira started it, and its continued over the generations quite faithfully, with a couple of glitches here and there.
There was tremendous thought given in the election of the people like Dr.Rajendra Prasad, Dr.Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan etc., But, things changed slowly. Mr.Zail Singh as honorable President of India, has told on record that he would take the broom and sweep the floor if Indira Gandhi asked him to do so. That doesn't stop there. We have seen a series of Presidents because of whom the charm of the post which was once held by stalwarts has marred. After all this, we have our present Hon'ble President Pratibha Patil. When the congress high-command has declared that Pratibha Patil would be nominated for the post, then one question arose in almost of the Congress plenary.."Who is Pratibha?" She finally became the President of India. If Congress wanted a lady president, probably they must of opted for Capt.Lakshmi Sehgal (she was an active member in INA, worked closely with Netaji), who contested against Dr.APJ. Thanks to the poor organization of NDA and UNPA, they led to whole lot of confusion, which would have hurt the most popular president of India, our beloved missile man.
Ofcourse, this doesn't start or end with Congress itself. We have BJP placing their candidates in the Governors seats whenever they get an opportunity. What I am trying to say is, ideally, we must have a rational and non-political candidate (atleast a political leader in the taste of all the parties) and NOT some biased person. We have seen the worst side of this bias in the times of Emergency, Punjab riots and Operation Blue Star. Would we like to see more of them?

3. "Suspense thriller": Latest repertoire of the Congress party, the script is a suspense thriller, about the next Prime minister. Generally, the scene begins with everyone praising Soniaji about her great sacrifice. Then, the high-command of Congress, would be waiting near the gates of 10- Janpath, in the hot sun for an order (did I say order, read it as consensus) on who would take the seat of honour. Ofcourse, there are some comedians who would leave queer dialogues like Rahul must be the next PM, although Rahul might be feeling that he must be on the seat only after his Romanian (or Spanish) Girl Friend permits him.
Finally, there would be a decision which is a surprising twist for all the audience (probably even to the actors), about the nomination. Some one as remote as Mr.M.Satyanarayana Rao (for those who don't know him, he is a faithful follower of Nehru-Gandhi family, and present minister in the Government of AP, for the department of Temples development in Andhra Pradesh), can become the next Prime minister of India. Since all that he needs is just Her 'Kripa'. Ofcourse, this is generally once in five years, but mainly depends on the sheer will of 10-Janpath.

True, this is all fun. But, we are getting entertained at the expense of our taxed money, and our welfare.

Arise and Awake!

(The Vivekananda Illam, which is now threatened to be replaced by the State Government is to the distaste of the large section of youth and admirers of Swami Vivekananda. The author was left flabbergasted to say the least, upon the decision of the present state government, and would like to share his views on the present scenario. This decision, according to the author, not only reflects the capricious way of decision making from our representatives, but also lack of their clarity on what Indian culture is.)

"Vivekananda was a soul of puissance if ever there was one, a very lion among men, but the definitive work he has left behind is quite incommensurate with our impression of his creative might and energy. We perceive his influence still working gigantically, we know not well how, we know not well where, in something that is not yet formed, something leonine, grand, intutive, upheaving that has entered the soul of India and we say, "Behold, Vivekananda still lives in the soul of his Mother and in the souls of her children". " - Sri Aurobindo

“Swami Vivekananda saved Hinduism and saved India. But for him, we would have lost our religion and would not have gained our freedom. We therefore owe everything to Swami Vivekananda.” - Sri Chakravarthi Rajagopalachari


I still remember making a poster for the internal publicity about a visit to Vivekananda Illam, this January. It was a part of the Institutes's celebrations of the National Youth Day, which commemorates the birthday of the National figure, Swami Vivekananda. And now, it is the same place, which is under the 'mercy' of some politicians, who would like to 're-define' Indian culture. For the readers who are not fortunate enough to know about the monument, let me elaborate on it.

It was in the year 1897 when Swami Vivekananda, one of the most influential spiritual leaders of all times delivered seven inspiring and historic lectures in Madras (now Chennai). The venue of his stay during this time was Vivekananda Illam, originally called Ice House. This was rechristened in 1963 as the Vivekananda Illam, as a tribute to Swamiji on the Centenary year of Swami Vivekananda.

This building witnessed some of the spiritual and nationalistic giants like Swami Vivekananda, Sister Nivedita and Swami RamaKrishnananda. One of the most significant and active RamaKrishna Maths, which right now resides in Mylapore, Chennai has taken its birth here, which was started by Swami Ramakrishnanda with the help of Shri.Bilagiri Iyengar, a disciple of Swami Vivekananda.


Some of the key features of Vivekananda Illam are as follows:
*The Vivekananda Illam house has an impressive gallery which displays about 150 rare pictures and photographs of the epoch making Swami Vivekananda – from his days as an itinerant monk (Parivrajaka days) to his conquest of West through his life and works.
*There is a section devoted to the cultural heritage of India from the ancient times till the modern age, a collection of colorful and vibrant
paintings. They portray the Indian history since the Vedic times.
*A section of photographs on the history of the building, which is now called the Vivekananda Illam.
*This historical monument has now become a place of pilgrimage for the devotees of Swami Vivekananda. It was here that Swamiji spent full nine days of his life in February 1897, meditating, praying and meeting visitors.

After a series of changing hands, the Vivekananda Illam was leased to Rama Krishna Math by State Government, in the year 1997. But, the state of the building when it was handed over were deplorable: an old, ruined, dilapidated structure, which was prone to the anti-social elements. By the relentless efforts of Rama Krishna Math and the donations from the people, the building was renovated and was added with all the above features. The Chief of DMK, who now would like to replace Illam, once hailed Rama Krishna Math as the 'Everest of the NGOs'. (Why this tremendous 'change' now?) Today, Vivekananda Illam stands as an important monument for the visitors to Chennai and also to the youth of India and admirers of Swamiji and as a symbol of Indian culture and tradition.

Having said this, let us see what the 'honourable' State Government of Tamil Nadu has to say. They would like to replace the present exhibition of Ramakrishna Math, with a centre for Classical Tamil. I wonder why the TamilNadu Government could think of the very place as the apt place for Tamil Culture. Its both surprising and amazing that the Engineering department of the state has zeroed upon precisely on the Illam in the metropoly of Chennai with an area of 180 square km.

Here is an article by New Indian Express dated:22nd April, 2008, about this issue.

The Dravidian parties in Tamil Nadu has made enough on playing on the histrionics of the people and on the Dravidian claptrap. We had too much of this tirade of regionalism and Dravidian politics. Let us not loose our own life-giving culture because a myopic vision of some of the political gargoyles. I humbly request the readers to contribute for the cause in the best possible way, if they are convinced that what the Government intends to do is harmful for India and its culture. You can sign an online petition by clicking here

Please note that, Tyranny of a Prince in an oligarchy is not so dangerous to the public welfare as the apathy of a citizen in democracy.
I welcome comments and suggestions on what can be done. Please feel free to comment.

From Licence Raj to Subsidy Raj

(The aim of this essay is about the gradual movement of Financial policies of India, from the Nehruvian times, till the recent government of Manmohan Singh. As we would see its a transition from the Fabian socialism to the liberalization, but now finally into the indiscriminate Subsidy Raj, which is supported by all the political parties in India. The author begs the pardon of the readers if he sounds harsh or illogical, but its in his best of intentions to keep things straight and try to take a rationalist view point towards the policies of Government.
This is the first draft of the article and would be improved sooner or later, depending on the availability of the author. He would like to end with a PJ: A blog a day, keeps your BTP at bay.)

It seems to me some of the policy decisions by Indian Government are like organizing rain dance during a drought, although it doesn't serve the purpose, it gives a feeling to the general public that the government is trying to do something seriously. Well, we shall see how Indian Government has been changed from the elaborate system of License Raj to the indiscriminate Subsidy Raj, which exists now.

"I want the corruptions of the Permit/Licence Raj to go. [...] I want the officials appointed to administer laws and policies to be free from pressures of the bosses of the ruling party, and gradually restored back to the standards of fearless honesty which they once maintained. [...] I want real equal opportunities for all and no private monopolies created by the Permit/Licence Raj.". These words are NOT from BJS (now, BJP ), Janata Party or anyother party. It is from the well known statesman, Bharat Ratna, C.Rajagopalachari, way back in 1960s in his newspaper Swarajya. Inspite of being a close associate of Nehru, and a ''conscience keeper of Mahatma", he was strong opposer of Fabian socialism and red-tape. But, it took almost 30 years for Indian Government for realizing the truth in his words. The license Raj is said to have been broken by Narsimha Rao's Government in 1990, due to macroeconomic crisis in India at that times.

The present Finance Minister, Mr.P Chidambaram, expressed his 'worry' over the extensive subsidies by the state and central governments during his short stint at the Office of ministry of Finance during 1996-98. Now, in April 2008, a jubiliant Chidambaram performs the 'impresario' act and comes up with the 'politicially' correct budget. The aim of the budget is to win back the 2009 elections for the Congress party, at the cost of the Government Exchequer. Ofcourse, with regard to the lack of time and space, I would dwell upon the budget subsidies for the two important vote banks of the Congress: the illiterate and the minorities.

The farmers are provided with Rs.60,000 crores, waiving their agri-based loans. The Punjab National bank, one of the leading lender of loans to farmers was left flabbergasted. Well, the central budget has the luxury of running over deficit, while banks cannot. The result: the banks will no more sponsor the funds for farmers, since their money is at risk in doing so. Please note that I am not against any reforms or help towards farmers. I hail from a farmers family, with stakes in the present agricultural sector. But, the farmers who generally hurt due to the loans, is not generally by the nationalized banks, but it is because of the high interest rates of the local money lenders. But, who cares? Afterall the 'rulers' need votes and political mileage, which they can safely derive at the cost of the tax payers. Ofcourse, we look for quick fixes, and assume that we have done 'enough' for the primary sector of Agriculture. The reforms in Agriculture would take another discussion altogether.

Next important votebank is minorities, which Congress is always successful in wooing at. The budget in terms of 'special' funds to the education and employment has increased from Rs.500 Crore in 2007-08 to Rs.1000 Crore this budget year. No questions asked from any political party, as usual.

Apart from this, subsidies rain from the state governments of Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, and nowadays Karnataka. The most interesting (or notorious) of them is free current, followed by the Rs.2 per Kilo rice. All the three state Governments talk about the above subsidies, interestingly the Tamil Nadu Govt. is always a step ahead. Free Color TVs, free Computers..surprisingly, everything comes virtually free in Tamil Nadu. All of the political parties in the states, both regional and national, not only deny the difficulty in implementing these policies, but also strongly advocate them. How do we do that? Simple, threaten the belt shops by setting high targets, where the same poor buy (rather made to buy) the spirits by paying 66% excise tax on them. Our leaders have understood Napoleon very well, who said the vices are strong patriots of his government, since they pay heavily for the exchequer.

Let me be clear. The aim is not the defame any party or any of the politicians. But, what we have been seeing over the past, and even now, is NOT because of real-politik of political parties, but because of our own sheer callous and irresponsible way of responding to the scenarios. In the words of Daniel Webster, "Nothing will ruin the country if the people themselves will undertake its safety and nothing can save it if they leave that safety to any hands, but their own."

What it means to be pseudo-secular?

(Before getting into the topic, the author expresses his helplessness over the present situation prevailing in his nation where the very utterance of 'religion', makes him a narrow minded fundamentalist. However, the author takes the freedom in the usage of the word and yet he claims that he doesn't belong to any of such group, on contrary to the notion of the general public and the political parties.

A self-proclaimed 'unbiased' (again, I am sure some of the readers might dispute) analysis about the strategy followed by some of the political 'leaders' (its unfortunate to call them so) and parties, who have faithfully taken it forward from their predecessors from Briton. As always, the author would be pleased to end the note with his usual statement: Healthy debates and discussions are always warmly welcome, either on emails/posts or over a coffee :D )

Being a pseudo-secular means a lot. Firstly, let us try to look at what it really means to be pseudo-secular and its implications. Then we shall the 'trade-offs' in being pseudo-secular, and ofcourse, I would end the article with how to be pseudo-secular. (Yes, you have seen it right!). This might become reference manual for all those who would like to get into a career of politics and who think they are 'beyond' any of the morality or ethical framework. So, I would be pleased if they would be obliged to pay me a royalty (atleast an acknowledgment would do!), given that they got benefited through my blog. ;)

To keep things simple, if we peep into an 'unconventional' source, Wikipedia calls Pseudo-secularism as the state of implicit non-secular trends in the face of pledged secularism. The term is used by groups who perceive a double standard exhibited within the established secular governing policy towards culturally different groups. Perhaps the very inclusion of the word 'Secular' in the Indian constitution seems a bit 'pseudo-secular'. It goes back to Mrs.Indira who took the initiative to include the word, 'secular' in Indian Constitution, through 42nd Amendment, 1976. We all would admit that, it was very admirable effort. However, our Congress Government has taken the best efforts to 'forget' defining what it means. Although, the Janata Government tried its hand in the process, the National Party which was in the brief opposition at that time, safely turned their efforts down. Now that we don't have the meaning of Secular in the constitution, anyone can define the way they wish. So, BJP is 'communal' as per Congress (while Muslim League is surprisingly not), and Congress is 'pseudo-secular' according to the Lotus party.

We all agree that Pseudo-secularism means double standards. Double standards about the religion or creed. For the readers who are less fortunate in knowing some deeper information about it, it is not a phenomenon in India alone. I feel that the monarchy of British, are the culprits for the idea inception into India. But let us be rational; enough of that tirade of praising Indian glory before their rule and cursing British for all that we are now. They did for their own benefit, I am sure they would also agree with that. But what is more hurting and embarrassing at the same time is that our leaders, were loyal enough to carry it forward even in the independent India for various reasons, the prime reason being - Vote bank politics (A different name for 'Divide and rule').

Now, being a pseudo-secular as we would see in further arguments, is an art. An art mastered by a few, and a few think its all in their 'blood'. My endeavors would be to develop a universal workbook for the pseudo-secular, I am sure its difficult to be all-inclusive. But it would in the best of my efforts to do so. Yes, its universal, so that it can be applicable in any part of the universe, as long as there are species with different religions or creeds co-existing. Lets list it down point wise, on the basic 'qualifications', if 'you' aim to be a pseudo-secular. Some of the 'role-models' who have excelled in those particular points, is mentioned. Due to my limited knowledge as well as energy, I couldn't mention all their chief proponents. I hope readers would have that kind heart to forgive me for my mistake.

1. One has to be either an atheist or 'very' secular. Preferably, his/her background must belong to the religion/creed, which is bearing the brunt in the end. Also, claim that you know a lot about it, as its your 'own' religion. Then, you would not have reprimands from media or critics that you are attacking another religion. (DMK Chief, Karunanidhi 'safely' questions the qualification of Lord Rama in building the Sethu and qualifies the Ramayana as work of fiction.)

2. Claim that he/she have suffered terribly because of a religion and a creed, and so that its now his/her turn. Forget about the dates. The question is whether your race/religion/creed was suppressed or not. (Antisemitism, anti-Hindu propaganda)

3. Blame the religion and its saints and seers for being narrow minded or fundamentalists. Include their 'misdeeds' (use your own creativity if they aren't enough) in your propaganda media. Be generous in using the school books or books from universities to reflect your ideas. This has been a wonderful strategy of many who are already successful in this pursuit. (In the case of school books in US, CBSE books in India about Hinduism)

There has been instances in US, where the kids (particularly of Jewish or Hindu origin) complained at home of being teased at the school. They are induced a psychological guilt, of holding an identity which is made infamous by the text books.

4. Portray yourself as an intellectual. If you already have an image of 'intellectual', your job is easier. That is because, intellectuals have the 'freedom of speech' and 'freedom of expression'. Ofcourse, I don't deny that everyone is entitled to it. But, as you can see, the intellectuals are 'more' equal. When, pressed by the accused religion or to give an explanation, express that your are not a hater of that particular religion, and there are various view-points towards it, as the history is very 'complex'. (Professor Michael Witzel, Wales Professor of Sanskrit in the Department of Sanskrit and Indian Studies at Harvard University; Romila Thapar, the 'famous' historian for instance).

5. Media is always there to help; Feel free to demand their services whenever necessary.

6. Finally into arts. Again, having a talent in any of the fields of art, music, filmography would help the business greatly. For example paint anything obscene on the culture, just because you see an 'aesthetic' beauty in it. Ofcourse, media is readily there to support your freedom of expression (You-know-who! :D). You can always shoot a film/'documentary' on your version of 'history'. But, don't forget to mention that in the foreword or at the end, so that it would add to your credibility.

7. With all this, you might feel that you are selling your soul. But if you already have the 'Saviour' syndrome, that helps you immensely and makes you feel that everything you do is for their own good. It would be great if you feel you are 'blessed' with more knowledge about God, by the God himself, while most of the others are 'pagans'. But, even after this, if there is any trace of guilt, remember Money and Power buys everything...almost everything that is!

There are many more strategies. As I have mentioned, this is definitely not an exhaustive list. I would add some more when I find some more time. But, I hope I have made the point, and made it quite loud and clear.

Reservations to Nehru Gandhi Family?

(This is the author's second blog, which also happens to be on Politics again. The choice was not all that intentional, but though he believes it magically turned out to be another political analysis. To caution, again the intention was not to aim at a particular person or a group, but just an analysis on the history, (on which he tried to take as neutral stance as possible, atleast to the best of his intentions). Healthy debates and discussions are warmly welcome, either on emails/posts or over a coffee :D )


An interesting line to begin with - 'Till 1947, we were ruled by the aliens. Since 1947 we are ruled by the alienated.' It was from our ex- HRD minister and Ramon Magsaysay Awardee Mr.Arun Shourie. I am sure he must have meant referring to the present politics in general, maynot be referring to any party or 'dynasty'. Probably, he is not that big a 'politician', or rather not that big a 'politician' yet.


As the title says, I would like to reflect on 'Reservations to the Nehru Gandhi family'. Let me be clear, I am not advocating it, but I am trying to analyse what has happened over the past sixty years of the great Indian political drama. Again, I would make some assumptions or see the things from my own frame of reference or the way I understand the history of Indian politics, which may not make everyone happy. But, my intention is not to make everyone happy either.
India had its 'tryst with destiny' of independence way back in 1947. Our prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, was truly charismatic to the core, carrying an impressive profile and a clean image. What we understand from the history and his own picture of himself, he was a sensitive, charming, easily influenciable, highly educated man from a well-to-do family, who seem to be influenced by the strong Fabian socialitic ideologies. Although some of the Right conservatives of India, would claim that Mr.Nehru has 'snatched' the opportunity of becoming the first Prime minister from a powerful leader, Sardar Vallabbhai Patel. Perhaps, Vallabbhai Patel's image of pro-hindu, or being strong and stern would have led the people like Gandhiji to opt for Nehru over Sardar. Lets not debate on this.
But, if we agree upon the choice made by the 'most' Congress men of that time, we have Panditji before us, which might not have seemed that bad an option afterall, even to the supporters of Patelji. In the very words of Patelji, Jawaharlal was a 'patriot' and he also says, "after all, he is also a Hindu and that a Kashmiri Hindu", in a letter to his collegue. But then, at the time when we couldnt afford blunders both in the internal policy decisions, and external affairs, Panditji seemed to have tumbled on too many. Panditji had laid foundation for three traits, which Congress party seemed to have stood for the next coming years - 'Ambivalence', 'Dynasty politics', and 'pseudo-secularism'. Let me be clear on what exactly I mean by these words.
Jawaharlal Nehru has stood for many issues for which he seemed to have either lack of clarity or was particularly ambivalent in the issue. Take the Kashmir issue for instance, it was perhaps the only Princely state which Panditji took 'special responsibility' on annexing into Indian Union (as he was a Kashmiri Pandit himself), while Sardar could be termed as 'successful' in doing the job of rest nearly 500 of them. We witness even now, on how well the job is done. Then comes, Panchasheel, on which ofcourse I cannot elaborate now, owing to my limited energy. Probably, another blog at a later time.
Kuldip Nayar outlines the events surrounding Nehru's terminal days and the succession to the prime minister's position. One of his loyalists, Kamaraja Nadar (who is venerated highly as the CM of Tamil Nadu), approached Nehru and asked whether he should install his daughter as the P.M. in succession. Nehru was supposed to have said "not now"(did he meant, 'may be at a later date?'). Ofcourse, Nehru could not degrade himself to ask that his daughter be chosen for the job. However, after the brief period of Lal Bahadur Shastri, we had Mrs.Indira on the PM hotseat. Although my next claim/statement might seem a bit aggressive or a personal remark, but I will go about it. Probably, Nehruji had a different understanding about the 'democracy' itself (Perhaps, to replace 'people' by 'my family' in Lincoln's famous statement on democracy? ).
In the words of Prof.Ramchandra Guha, "Nehru empathized with, but desisted from reforming Muslim code; he preferred to leave it for a later day and to Muslim leadership." On the other hand, after the assassination of the Mahatma, many of the Jan Sangh and RSS leaders like Guruji Golvalkar etc., were kept in jail, without a proper trial. Probably, the very idea of the present situation of 'pseudo-secularism' traces backs it roots to there. From then, like what our senior political analyists call, Pseudo-secularism has become bread and butter for the Congress party like the trade-unionists for the Communists and language jingoists to Shiv Sena.
Having said all this about Panditji, let me stop here. With all my veneration to the Chachaji, I feel that he would have made a good minister (Perhaps, an Educational ministry or HRD ministry), but I am afraid, I will have to admit that he was not the PM material.
After Nehruji, if we close our eyes about the history of next one and half years, for which we had a rare opportunity to see some one from outside Nehru-Gandhi family, we have Mrs.Gandhi as the first woman prime minister. An 'inexperienced yound child' in the words of JayPrakash Narayan, and a 'sugar doll' as per Ram Manohar Lohia, has led India for the next one and half decade (with a brief-break in between ofcourse). Lot of things are attributed to Mrs.Gandhi - Green revolution, Nuclear program of India, 'Garibi Hatao' slogan, and finally the transition of surname from Nehru to Gandhi, which would assure a strong political career for the family. Again, to go into what Indira has done over the nearly 15 years of her political career, might take another different blog altogether, but to be brief, there were brightest and darkest periods to India during the time. Indo-pak war, the independence of Bangladesh has made her image into a dynamic and strong lady, while, the emergency, lack of accountability, improper trails over many people, dictatorial tendencies, etc., implies a lot at her attitude and faith (which is surprisingly different from Nehru) over the word 'Democracy'. In a gist, she can be termed as, Priya Duryodhani, as Shashi Tharoor calls in his 'The great Indian novel'.


After the assassination of Mrs.Gandhi as a consequence to the operation Blue star, we have our Rajiv. Having written something on Rajiv in my previous blog, I am not keen to talk more.
After a silence for another 4-5 years, we have Soniaji, although not a blood relation to the family (ofcourse, in that way Mrs.Indira was also not related to Mahatma Gandhi, however we are just bothered about just the title right?), came into picture as the party president. I am sure Rahul would have succeeded Rajiv, but unfortunately he was kid then, not having the age of even contesting in the elections. So, since we obviously cannot change the constitution for his career, 'they' needed to wait for a while. After many years, of nearly a decade, in the elections of 2004, we have another candidate from the family. Yes, you have seen it right!. I am referring to the string bearer over the honorable present P.M. Manmohan Singhji, Smt.Sonia Maino (read it as Gandhi again). Ofcourse, RaeBareli and Amethi had the rare priveleg of hosting the two Gandhis back to the Parliament, although may not be till the PMO.
Having been in the role of Party president unanimously except once (when there was an election for Congress party president which is on 1999, an opposition from Mr.Jitendra Prasad) for 10 years, Mrs.Sonia is now busy in chalking out plans for the career of the 37 year old Rahul. Lets wait and see whats going to happen next. Afterall, there is charm in unpredicability and I think 'the Family' wouldnt like to break that charm either.
In the words of Rajnath Singh, the present BJP President - two events which have changed the course of the Independent India are, the people's movement led by JayPrakash Narayan, and then RamJanma Bhoomi movement by BJP. Very true! What we have seen was the first shown that the Congress was not invincible even at the National level, while the second shown that the alternative to Congress, can give a stable alternative Government.
After saying all this, it might seem that I was drifting away from the topic. Let me make a comeback. Let us all admit that, politics is a lucrative career. I would like my son/daughter to pursue a career, which gives us (my family I mean) fame and money, which in the case of Ambanis - it is business, Kapoors into movies and for 'the Family', it turns out to be the politics. If we look at them from the career and family perspective, yes, they have tried to make best out of a given situation, career wise. I hold no blame to anyone of them what-so-ever, But, when it comes to everyone outside the Nehru-Gandhi group, we are badly hit, not just in terms of opportunities, but also in terms of quality of administration and life. All the above examples, are just to reflect on what has happened, and how was the decision made by us, was not that good a choice. In the process of admiring a a few people's contribution, we got carried away by the family names, there by providing what Dr.Ambedkar advocated for the unpriveleged.